Since Saturday, we have been preparing for the affects of Sandy. Water, batteries, staples. Last night it began raining. I awoke feeling pretty good-- and had my morning coffee and two rounds of wii tennis.

I thought about putting a roast in the slow cooker, did put wood and kindling in the fireplace and set up my mobile office in the den so I could track the storm with the news folks. News reports here are suggesting widespread power outages-- however other than non-stop rain we have had very little in the way of other issues due to the storm. Photos-- of my mobile office today.

What am I working on? I wish I could say-- repairing some of the inoperable interfaces on WiredPages. More I am hoping a dead pine tree in a neighboring yard does not fall and do damage to the house. Confirming DOJs actions for the last 30 days as explained to me over the last 30 days. I am not sure why DOJ did not get the tapes from sessions with the powerful individual, his lawyer and issues with the first Federal Reserve account so a lot of this could have been avoided. A US Attorney [female-- doj] also claimed to be online with me yesterday, before the post. I keep asking what these personal issues offered by people like this have to do with an interview or investigation. I am not part of the Washington scene. You owe explanations. Not your personal opinions. Does the US owe? Do you approve the tab amount? Is there anything I have not answered?

You personally do not like me? I am told my business associates want to pay me and their funds are included in the overall deal. Why- probably to explain why they thought I was being paid and to have washington look at their crap in more detail. I am too connected to powerful people that took it upon themselves to call my business associates. DOJ-- they took the money from the individual and his lawyer in June just before I left. I am told because the money kept going to the wrong account. go get the tapes. I am told 30 days ago they gave it to you {DOJ}.

Earpiece chatter? Feedback from yesterday's post-- which I am not really interested in. Soon after the post went online- issues with gain stopped. It was a hard night -- on Saturday, which in part prompted the post along with the US attorney who asked me what appeared to be a rhetorical question-- "why don't we like you?". No, I do not wish to work with government types. Why is one of your females in my ear threatening me? I used to date lawyers. I probably will never be impressed with female lawyers.. They seem to think this is personal when it should be "oh my god-- what have we done". That said-- it has been a hard 3 weeks or so. I am not liking the power of the earpiece in the left ear-- and this respite has been a welcome relief.

I need judges to look at the behavior of washington types via the tapes and explain. If they did not agree why take the money? The powerful guy tried some things back in April, May and June of 2012 [as the deal was being set]. Why didn't they review those tapes. It is my understanding my business associates were tired of paying well connected family and others. Why would DOJ try the same things? The claim now? There is a court order to pay the settlements however US attorney said she wanted the source to take it back? Which one? Multiple settlements. She's mad because I told her I don't care? God-- too many in washington- get your bitches off me. Too screwed and not in the mood for anymore.. Not business? Keep them out of my ear.